Unit Code: NURSING 740

Unit Subject: Prescribing in Advanced Nursing Practice

Word count: 2500 words

The assessment for this unit is based on students undertaking a critical analysis of the role of the Nurse Practitioner (NP). Students are required to discuss the specific skills and clinical challenges of the role they have chosen to their workplace. This assignment will provide students with the opportunity to explore and gain further theoretical understanding of the chosen role. Students are required to discuss the registration standards in Australia and the practice domains. In order to complete this paper, the students are required to review 7-8 referred journal articles in relation to the roles of Nurse Practitioner and they are also required to locate and utilize the websites for the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia and the Australian Health Care Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) site.

Rubric

Assessment 3 (Assignment 3)
Assessment 3 (Assignment 3)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

5 to >4.0 pts

HD
Evidence of exceptional understanding and clear and adequate description of the selected role.

4 to >3.0 pts

D
Evidence of relevant knowledge and understanding of the selected role.

3 to >2.5 pts

C
Adequately identifies and describes the selected role.

2.5 to >2.0 pts

P
Provides minimal description and understanding of the selected role.

2 to >0 pts

N
Fails to provide an adequate description and understanding of the selected role.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and literature

15 to >14.0 pts

HD
Purpose of the writing is very clear and ideas flow in a logical sequence. The student provides 10 to 15 relevant academic references in the paper. A minimum of 5-7 peer reviewed journal articles are included.

14 to >11.0 pts

D
Purpose of the writing is clear. The student provides 10 to 15 relevant academic references in the paper. A minimum of 5-7 peer reviewed journal articles are included.

11 to >8.0 pts

C
is provided. The student utilizes 10 to 15 relevant academic references in the paper. A minimum of 5-7 peer reviewed journal articles are included.

8 to >7.5 pts

P
Purpose of the writing is provided. The student utilizes 10 to 15 relevant academic references in the paper. A minimum of 5-7 peer reviewed journal articles are included.

7.5 to >0 pts

N
Purpose is not clear. Student provides less than 10 references. Uses many text and internet sources. Does not use peer reviewed and/or evidence- based practice source(s).
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritically evaluates and appraises the role

20 to >18.0 pts

HD
A comprehensive critical analysis of the chosen role is provided. Consistently interprets the information gathered in an accurate and highly insightful way and provides highly creative and unique syntheses of that information. Demonstrates exceptional understanding of the important concepts of the nursing role. Demonstrates an excellent ability to incorporate and integrate relevant research throughout the paper.

18 to >15.0 pts

D
A very good critical analysis of the chosen role is provided. Consistently interprets the information gathered for an accurate synthesis of the information concisely. Displays a very good understanding of the important concepts of the nursing role. Demonstrates a strong ability to incorporate and integrate the research throughout the paper.

15 to >11.0 pts

C
A good critical analysis of the chosen role is provided. Sporadically interprets the information gathered for a limited synthesis of its application. Displays a good understanding of the important concepts and generalizations. Incorporates research sporadically throughout the discussion paper.

11 to >7.0 pts

P
A brief critical analysis of the chosen role is provided. Rarely interprets information accurate information and very poor synthesis of application of policy. Displays an incomplete understanding of the important concepts and generalization and has some notable misconceptions. Only provides minimal amount of research to support the discussion throughout paper.

7 to >0 pts

N
An inadequate analysis of the chosen role and minimal support provided. Fails to interpret information gathered for the synthesis of the application of policy. Demonstrates severe misconceptions about the concepts and generalizations. Fails to incorporate or integrate research to support the discussion throughout paper.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation

5 to >4.0 pts

HD
Objectives are very clearly provided. Logical and sequential arrangement of arguments and discussions. Sentence structure and grammar excellent. Headings are very accurately labelled, and the information presented under the heading is consistent with the heading. Conclusion provides a very clear summary of the presentation. No new information is provided.

4 to >3.0 pts

D
Objectives are clearly provided. Good flow of ideas. Mostly logical and sequential arrangement of arguments and discussions. Headings are clearly labelled, and the information presented under the heading is relevant to the heading. Conclusion provides a clear summary of the presentation. No new information is provided.

3 to >2.5 pts

C
Objectives are provided in the presentation but not consistently clear. Minor issues with flow of ideas. Logical and sequential arrangement of arguments and discussions. Not all headings are clearly provided and the information under each heading is not always relevant to the heading. Conclusion provides an adequate summary of the presentation. No new information is provided.

2.5 to >2.0 pts

P
Objectives are only briefly mentioned in the presentation. Lack of clarity with ideas and inconsistent structure with the arrangement of arguments and discussions. Headings are only provided sometimes and/or the information under the heading not always relevant to the heading. Conclusion provides a poor summary of the presentation. No new information is provided.

2 to >0 pts

N
Objectives are not mentioned in the presentation. Incoherent structure. Ideas do not flow in a logical or sequential manner. Poor planning of the paper. Headings are not labelled consistently and/or unclear. The information provided is inconsistent with the topic heading. Inconsistent referencing or missing referencing. Conclusion is not provided.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format and References

5 to >4.0 pts

HD
Paper contains 1-2 errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling. Paper meets APA guidelines regarding margins, font, references etc. All content follows current APA writing guidelines

4 to >3.0 pts

D
Paper contains less than 3 errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling. Paper meets appropriate APA guidelines regarding margins, font, references, etc. Most content compliant with current APA writing guidelines

3 to >2.5 pts

C
Paper contains less than 3 errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling. Paper uses minimal APA guidelines regarding appropriate margins, font, references, etc. Minimal compliance with current APA writing guidelines

2.5 to >2.0 pts

P
Paper contains 5 or more grammatical, punctuation or spelling errors. Paper attempts to use some APA guidelines for appropriate margins, font, references, etc. Most of content is not in compliance with current APA writing guidelines.

2 to >0 pts

N
Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation or spelling errors. Paper does not use appropriate margins, font, references, etc. The content is not compliant with current APA writing guidelines
5 pts
Total Points: 50

 

“You can order Nursing 740: Critical analysis of the role of the Nurse Practitioner (NP)Assignment from our service and can get a completely high-quality custom paper. Our service offers any of the Nursing 740 Academic paper written from scratch, according to all customers’ requirements, expectations and highest standards.”

  • 100% Plagiarism Free

  • 24X7 Customer Support

  • Multiple Revisions

  • 100% Confidential

  • On-time Delivery

  • 500+ Experts

Order Now

Over 5,000
4.9 Star Ratings

Click Here! Get Free Assistance

Rated 4.9/5 by 5,000 Students

Get Solution Now

Leave A Comment